Quake-Catcher Network: Difference between revisions
first light |
→Scientific publications: add pubs |
||
| Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
== Scientific publications == | == Scientific publications == | ||
The following list distinguishes papers that used data directly computed or collected through the BOINC-based Quake-Catcher Network platform, | The following list distinguishes papers that used data directly computed or collected through the BOINC-based Quake-Catcher Network platform, as listed on [https://boinc.berkeley.edu/pubs.php#Quake-Catcher the official BOINC publications page], from other publications about or related to the project. | ||
=== Publications based on BOINC-computed data === | === Publications based on BOINC-computed data === | ||
* | * {{Cite journal |last1=Chen |first1=Kate Huihsuan |last2=Liang |first2=Wen-Tzong |last3=Lin |first3=Chun-Hung |last4=Wu |first4=Leon Yufeng |title=Citizen Seismology in Taiwan: Development, Outreach, and Formative Assessment of Near-Real Time Earthquake Game Competition Activities |journal=Frontiers in Earth Science |year=2020 |doi=10.3389/feart.2020.00154 |url=https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/feart.2020.00154/full}} | ||
* Yildirim | * {{Cite journal |last1=Fu |first1=Jihua |last2=Li |first2=Zhitao |last3=Meng |first3=Hao |last4=Wang |first4=Jianjun |last5=Shan |first5=Xinjian |title=Performance Evaluation of Low-Cost Seismic Sensors for Dense Earthquake Early Warning: 2018–2019 Field Testing in Southwest China |journal=Sensors |volume=19 |issue=9 |pages=1999 |year=2019 |doi=10.3390/s19091999 |url=https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/19/9/1999}} | ||
* | * {{Cite journal |last1=Liang |first1=Wen-Tzong |last2=Lee |first2=Jian-Cheng |last3=Chen |first3=Kate Huihsuan |last4=Hsiao |first4=Nai-Chi |title=Citizen Earthquake Science in Taiwan: From Science to Hazard Mitigation |journal=Journal of Disaster Research |year=2017 |doi=10.20965/jdr.2017.p1174 |url=https://www.fujipress.jp/jdr/dr/dsstr001200061174}} (with Academia Sinica Institute of Earth Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University Department of Earth Sciences, and Central Weather Bureau Seismological Center) | ||
* {{Cite journal |last1=Dominguez |first1=L. A. |last2=Yildirim |first2=B. |last3=Husker |first3=A. L. |last4=Cochran |first4=E. |last5=Christensen |first5=C. |last6=Cruz-Atienza |first6=V. M. |last7=Lawrence |first7=J. F. |title=The Red Atrapa Sismos (Quake-Catcher Network in Mexico): Assessing Performance during Large and Damaging Earthquakes |journal=Seismological Research Letters |volume=86 |issue=3 |pages=848–855 |year=2015 |doi=10.1785/0220140171 |url=https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/srl/article/86/3/848-855/315678}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last1=Dixit |first1=Amod Mani |last2=Ringler |first2=Adam T. |last3=Sumy |first3=Danielle F. |title=Strong-Motion Observations of the M 7.8 Gorkha, Nepal, Earthquake Sequence and Development of the N-SHAKE Strong-Motion Network |journal=Seismological Research Letters |volume=86 |issue=6 |pages=1533–1539 |year=2015 |doi=10.1785/0220150146 |url=https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/srl/article/86/6/1533-1539/349127}} et al. | |||
* {{Cite journal |last1=Chung |first1=Angela I. |last2=Cochran |first2=Elizabeth S. |last3=Kaiser |first3=Anna E. |last4=Christensen |first4=Carl M. |last5=Yildirim |first5=Battalgazi |last6=Lawrence |first6=Jesse F. |title=Improved Rapid Magnitude Estimation for a Community-Based, Low-Cost MEMS Accelerometer Network |journal=Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America |volume=105 |issue=3 |pages=1314–1323 |year=2015 |doi=10.1785/0120140232 |url=https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/bssa/article/105/3/1314-1323/331819}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last1=Neighbors |first1=C. |last2=Liao |first2=E. J. |last3=Cochran |first3=E. S. |title=Investigation of the High-Frequency Attenuation Parameter, κ (kappa), from Aftershocks of the 2010 Mw 8.8 Maule, Chile Earthquake |journal=Geophysical Journal International |volume=200 |issue=1 |pages=200–215 |year=2015 |doi=10.1093/gji/ggu390 |url=http://academic.oup.com/gji/article/200/1/200/748351/Investigation-of-the-highfrequency-attenuation}} et al. | |||
* {{Cite journal |last1=Yildirim |first1=B. |last2=Cochran |first2=E. S. |last3=Chung |first3=A. |last4=Christensen |first4=C. M. |last5=Lawrence |first5=J. F. |title=On the Reliability of Quake-Catcher Network Earthquake Detections |journal=Seismological Research Letters |volume=86 |issue=3 |pages=856–869 |year=2015 |doi=10.1785/0220140218 |url=https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/srl/article/86/3/856-869/315684}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last1=Lawrence |first1=J. F. |last2=Cochran |first2=E. S. |last3=Chung |first3=A. |title=Rapid Earthquake Characterization Using MEMS Accelerometers and Volunteer Hosts Following the M 7.2 Darfield, New Zealand, Earthquake |journal=Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America |volume=104 |issue=1 |pages=184–192 |year=2014 |doi=10.1785/0120120196 |url=https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/bssa/article/104/1/184-192/331754}} et al. | |||
* {{Cite journal |last1=Benson |first1=K. |last2=Schlachter |first2=S. |last3=Estrada |first3=T. |last4=Taufer |first4=M. |last5=Lawrence |first5=J. |last6=Cochran |first6=E. |title=On the Powerful Use of Simulations in the Quake-Catcher Network to Efficiently Position Low-Cost Earthquake Sensors |journal=Future Generation Computer Systems |year=2013 |doi=10.1016/j.future.2013.04.012 |url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167739X13000721}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last1=Chung |first1=A. I. |last2=Neighbors |first2=C. |last3=Belmonte |first3=A. |title=The Quake-Catcher Network Rapid Aftershock Mobilization Program Following the 2010 M 8.8 Maule, Chile Earthquake |journal=Seismological Research Letters |volume=82 |issue=4 |pages=526–532 |year=2011 |doi=10.1785/gssrl.82.4.526 |url=https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/srl/article/82/4/526-532/143840}} et al. | |||
* {{Cite journal |last1=Cochran |first1=Elizabeth S. |last2=Lawrence |first2=Jesse F. |last3=Christensen |first3=Carl |last4=Jakka |first4=Ravi S. |title=The Quake-Catcher Network: Citizen Science Expanding Seismic Horizons |journal=Seismological Research Letters |volume=80 |issue=1 |pages=26–30 |year=2009 |doi=10.1785/gssrl.80.1.26 |url=https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.80.1.26}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last1=Cochran |first1=Elizabeth |last2=Lawrence |first2=Jesse |last3=Christensen |first3=Carl |last4=Chung |first4=Angela |title=A Novel Strong-Motion Seismic Network for Community Participation in Earthquake Monitoring |journal=IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine |year=2009 |doi=10.1109/MIM.2009.5338255 |url=http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5338255/}} | |||
=== Other project-related publications === | === Other project-related publications === | ||
* | * {{Cite web |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187705091400218X |title=Study of the Network Impact on Earthquake Early Warning in the Quake-Catcher Network Project |website=Procedia Computer Science (ICCS 2014) |access-date=2 July 2026}} | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
Latest revision as of 19:08, 2 July 2026
Quake-Catcher Network (QCN) was a BOINC-based volunteer computing project that turned ordinary internet-connected computers into a low-cost, distributed strong-motion seismic network. Rather than performing conventional number-crunching, QCN read the built-in or externally attached accelerometer on a volunteer's device and streamed motion data back to project servers, where it was analyzed for signs of earthquake shaking. The project ran from 5 December 2007 until its discontinuation on 1 June 2023.[1]
QCN was notable for using Micro-Electro-Mechanical System (MEMS) accelerometers already built into many laptops, as well as inexpensive external USB sensors, to approximate the coverage of a conventional strong-motion seismic network at a fraction of the cost.[2]
History
QCN was founded at Stanford University in 2007–2008 by software developer Carl Christensen, working with seismologist Elizabeth S. Cochran and Jesse F. Lawrence.[1][2] The project's BOINC application first appeared under the working names "QCN Alpha" and "QCN Alpha Test" before becoming a live production project.[3]
In 2011, Cochran received a Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers from President Barack Obama, awarded in large part for her role in founding QCN.[1]
Project administration subsequently moved from Stanford to the California Institute of Technology (Caltech), where it was run largely on autopilot.[1][4] In 2016, QCN was transferred to the Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC) at the University of Southern California, with continued support from the Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology (IRIS).[1]
QCN was formally discontinued on 1 June 2023; the project's website subsequently displayed a closure notice.[5]
Sensors and hardware

QCN accepted motion data from two broad categories of sensor:
- Internal sensors — the shock-protection accelerometers already built into many laptops, most notably Apple MacBook and IBM/Lenovo ThinkPad models, as well as the motion sensors in smartphones and tablets.[3][1]
- External USB sensors — low-cost, purpose-built accelerometers for desktop computers that lacked an internal sensor. QCN officially supported three such devices: the codemercs.com JoyWarrior 24F8, the ONavi sensor, and the MotionNode Accel.[1]
Sensors measured acceleration on three axes across a range of roughly ±2g (where g is Earth's standard gravity, 9.81 m/s2), sampled at 50 Hz.[6] Because desktop USB sensors could be fixed and oriented to true north, scientists generally preferred them over laptop-internal sensors, which could move or be reoriented by their owners.[6]
Detection algorithm
Each QCN client continuously evaluated incoming accelerometer samples for anomalous motion using a short-term-average/long-term-average (STA/LTA) triggering scheme, a standard approach in seismic event detection.[7] A trigger was declared when a computed statistic exceeded a fixed threshold, commonly expressed as a Z-score of the instantaneous acceleration relative to the recent noise floor:
where is the current acceleration sample, is the local mean (long-term average) acceleration, and is its standard deviation. When exceeded a threshold of approximately 3, the client streamed a compact packet of trigger information — including maximum amplitude and timestamp — to a QCN server for correlation against triggers from other sensors in space and time.[8] QCN sensors were best suited to detecting moderate-to-large earthquakes (roughly magnitude 5.0 and above) in populated areas, since their sensitivity was lower than that of professional-grade seismometers.[2]
Software and client
The QCN BOINC application was a "non-CPU-intensive" project by BOINC's own classification: unlike most BOINC projects, host computers did not perform significant scientific calculation, but instead acted as always-on data-collection and reporting nodes.[3] A companion Qt-based application called QCNLive let volunteers view live sensor readings, review recorded ground motion, and browse global earthquake activity.[9] The QCN client and server source code was released under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) version 3 or later, with a copyright held by IRIS covering the 2007–2016 period.[4]
QCN also shipped a BOINC screensaver, shown below.
Scientific impact

QCN sensors recorded data from a number of major earthquakes, including the 2010 magnitude 8.8 Maule, Chile earthquake, the 2010 magnitude 7.1 Darfield, New Zealand earthquake, and the 2015 magnitude 7.8 Gorkha, Nepal earthquake.[10] A Mexican deployment of the network, the Red Atrapa Sismos, was separately evaluated for its performance during large and damaging earthquakes in that country.[7]
Beyond research, QCN placed low-cost sensors in K-12 classrooms and museums as an educational and outreach tool, letting students and the public participate directly in seismic data collection.[11]
Scientific publications
The following list distinguishes papers that used data directly computed or collected through the BOINC-based Quake-Catcher Network platform, as listed on the official BOINC publications page, from other publications about or related to the project.
Publications based on BOINC-computed data
- (2020).Citizen Seismology in Taiwan: Development, Outreach, and Formative Assessment of Near-Real Time Earthquake Game Competition Activities. Frontiers in Earth Science. DOI: 10.3389/feart.2020.00154.
- (2019).Performance Evaluation of Low-Cost Seismic Sensors for Dense Earthquake Early Warning: 2018–2019 Field Testing in Southwest China. Sensors. pp. 1999. DOI: 10.3390/s19091999.
- (2017).Citizen Earthquake Science in Taiwan: From Science to Hazard Mitigation. Journal of Disaster Research. DOI: 10.20965/jdr.2017.p1174. (with Academia Sinica Institute of Earth Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University Department of Earth Sciences, and Central Weather Bureau Seismological Center)
- (2015).The Red Atrapa Sismos (Quake-Catcher Network in Mexico): Assessing Performance during Large and Damaging Earthquakes. Seismological Research Letters. pp. 848–855. DOI: 10.1785/0220140171.
- (2015).Strong-Motion Observations of the M 7.8 Gorkha, Nepal, Earthquake Sequence and Development of the N-SHAKE Strong-Motion Network. Seismological Research Letters. pp. 1533–1539. DOI: 10.1785/0220150146. et al.
- (2015).Improved Rapid Magnitude Estimation for a Community-Based, Low-Cost MEMS Accelerometer Network. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. pp. 1314–1323. DOI: 10.1785/0120140232.
- (2015).Investigation of the High-Frequency Attenuation Parameter, κ (kappa), from Aftershocks of the 2010 Mw 8.8 Maule, Chile Earthquake. Geophysical Journal International. pp. 200–215. DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggu390. et al.
- (2015).On the Reliability of Quake-Catcher Network Earthquake Detections. Seismological Research Letters. pp. 856–869. DOI: 10.1785/0220140218.
- (2014).Rapid Earthquake Characterization Using MEMS Accelerometers and Volunteer Hosts Following the M 7.2 Darfield, New Zealand, Earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. pp. 184–192. DOI: 10.1785/0120120196. et al.
- (2013).On the Powerful Use of Simulations in the Quake-Catcher Network to Efficiently Position Low-Cost Earthquake Sensors. Future Generation Computer Systems. DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2013.04.012.
- (2011).The Quake-Catcher Network Rapid Aftershock Mobilization Program Following the 2010 M 8.8 Maule, Chile Earthquake. Seismological Research Letters. pp. 526–532. DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.82.4.526. et al.
- (2009).The Quake-Catcher Network: Citizen Science Expanding Seismic Horizons. Seismological Research Letters. pp. 26–30. DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.80.1.26.
- (2009).A Novel Strong-Motion Seismic Network for Community Participation in Earthquake Monitoring. IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine. DOI: 10.1109/MIM.2009.5338255.
- Study of the Network Impact on Earthquake Early Warning in the Quake-Catcher Network Project. Procedia Computer Science (ICCS 2014). Retrieved 2 July 2026.
See also
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Quake-Catcher Network. Wikipedia. Retrieved 2 July 2026.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 (2009).The Quake-Catcher Network: Citizen Science Expanding Seismic Horizons. Seismological Research Letters. pp. 26–30. DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.80.1.26.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Quake Catcher Network – Seismic Monitoring. BOINC. Retrieved 2 July 2026.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 VCTLabs/qcn: Quake-Catcher Network. GitHub. Retrieved 2 July 2026.
- ↑ (26 June 2023).Quakecatcher. Wayback Machine archive of quakecatcher.net. Retrieved 2 July 2026.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Quakecatcher — Sensors. quakecatcher.net. Retrieved 2 July 2026.
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 (2015).The Red Atrapa Sismos (Quake Catcher Network in Mexico): Assessing Performance during Large and Damaging Earthquakes. Seismological Research Letters. pp. 848–855. DOI: 10.1785/0220140195.
- ↑ Earthquake Detection at the Edge: IoT Crowdsensing Network. arXiv. Retrieved 2 July 2026.
- ↑ Quake Catcher Network — Topics by Science.gov. Retrieved 2 July 2026.
- ↑ Crowd-Sourcing Seismic Data for Education and Research Opportunities with the Quake-Catcher Network. NASA/ADS. Retrieved 2 July 2026.
- ↑ Quake-Catcher Network. SciStarter. Retrieved 2 July 2026.
